We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the winter of 2008 (and here already the problem begins with this narrative mode), I began postdoctoral research with Martin McQuillan on the Paul de Man Papers housed at UCI's Special Collections and Archives. Despite having spent years writing a lengthy dissertation on de Man and Heidegger, I had successfully managed to avoid a trip up to the fifth floor archive at Langson Library. My first task from Martin, however (and that would be Martin McQuillan not Martin Heidegger), was to take a look at what was then being called de Man's long Rousseau manuscript, and transcribe it. There were hopes that this handwritten manuscript was an unpublished work, and indeed it had been placed in a section of the Paul de Man Papers called ‘Unpublished Materials’. Without even noticing, I had already fallen into the archival trap: i.e., the work of hermeneutic unearthing, uncovering and unburying – already in itself grounded in problematic assumptions concerning truth and reading, but also quickly leading to ideological cover-ups, grave robbing and pious re-burials. And the magic burial dust for these purposes was there not to serve the dead, nor even the living, but for us, the zombies. As it turns out, zombies – those who cannot speak and have no inner rational consciousness or will – make the best transcribers. The hypomnesic writings of copyists tell us that the radical exteriority of inscription is either all archive or is no archive at all.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.